Saturday 18 June, 2011

The Lawyer on the US Top 50

The current issue of The Lawyer features the cover story, "US top 50's £23.4bn haul makes 2007 the best year ever."  (That's $46.8-billion to us.)  Top-line:

  • Year over year revenue for the 50 largest US-headquartered firms was up more than 16%, from $40.27-billion in 2006
  • The average PPP rose 11% from $1.55-million in 2006 to $1.72-million in 2007
  • The leaders in revenue growth were:
    • DLA Piper, +110% largely by virtue of consolidating its EMEA operations with its US operations
    • K&L/Gates, +51.3%, and Reed Smith, +38.2%, helped by mergers
    • Debevoise and Latham, each up 23.5%, on sheer performance
  • The laggards in revenue growth were:
    • WilmerHale, 4.8%
    • Akin Gump, 3.4%
    • Pillsbury, 1.9%
    • Jones Day, flat
    • Holland & Knight, -0.2%
  • Highest PPP:
    • Wachtell, $4.48-million
    • Cravath, $3.30
    • Sullivan & Cromwell, $3.13
    • Simpson Thacher, $2.87
    • Cadwalader, $2.72—notable for also being 49th out of 50th in "growth in PPP," at -6.2% [see below]
  • Lowest PPP:
    • Hunton & Williams:  $850-thousand
    • K&L/Gates: $800
    • Fulbright & Jaworski:  $777
    • Jones Day:  $770
    • Holland & Knight:  $699

As always, take all PPP figures with a tablespoon of salt.  "Your mileage may vary."  That's why it may be more informative to look at strongest and weakest PPP growth—at least we can assume (can't we?) we're comparing last year's apples with this year's apples.  So:

  • Strongest PPP growth:
    • Baker Botts, +30.0%
    • Debevoise, 27.2%
    • Latham, 22.7%
    • Baker & McKenzie, 21.8%
    • Paul Hastings, 20.0%
  • Weakest PPP growth:
    • Fulbright & Jaworski, +0.9%
    • Jones Day, flat
    • Holland & Knight, -0.1%
    • Cadwalader, -6.2%
    • Akin Gump, -7.0%

Here's the cover page, the second page of the article, and the key 50-firm table.  With all this information out now, why wait for the AmLaw 100?

I'm also happy to report that I was able to contribute a few thoughts, including the warning:

"that while the record results were partly down [sic: due] to increased levels of work across most practices last year, a large portion of the increase in revenues was driven by rate hikes.

"On the extremely plausible assumption that activity cools this year, additional rate hikes are essentially the only tool firms have left if they expect to generate year-on-year revenue growth," said MacEwen. "One has to question whether corporate clients will have the stomach for additional rate increases in this economic environment."

What’s striking about these results is how fast firms have to run just to stay in place.  Solid double-digit increases in revenue and profitability would be the envy of many a corporate CEO.  (And we have enjoyed this for several years in a row, now.) 

But this year the challenge for these firms will be avoiding the temptation to stand pat in a worrisome environment.  Challenging times tend not to re-cement the status quo but rather to make for the emergence of new leaders.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.adamsmithesq.com/cgi-bin/mt5.01/mt-tb.cgi/2641

Leave a comment

Monthly Archives

 
Select a month from the dropdown
 

Recent Entries

     "Wait and [Never] See"
Last week I wrote about innovation and how the early adopters can gain sustainable competitive advantage.  This week is something of a follow-on, albeit one…
     Memorial Day 2011
     Be Innovative? Who, Me?
Jim Surowiecki, writing his regular column in The New Yorker, "The Financial Page," wrote last week about innovation and why it seems to take hold…
     God is in the Details
Alex Novarese, Editor in Chief of LegalWeek, has a smart column this week called "Rugged Individualism--a year of firm-specific achievement in the US." Here are…
     Limits, Still
Normally I don't refer to events stemming from my own experience in commenting on our industry-indeed, this is something of a first in the 8-year…
     Who's Signing Your Paycheck?
A loyal and exceptionally thoughtful reader, and reasonably regular correspondent (also with a strong academic background in economics), writes: Bruce: I enjoyed your 9 February think…
     Adam Smith, Esq. Launches A New Company: JD Match
Today Adam Smith, Esq. takes great pleasure in announcing the launch of a new company dedicated to rationalizing and bringing a measure of order, efficiency,…
     Fifth in Our Series on Strategy: What it Takes to Be Tier 2
Recently, I wrote about what I called the Tier 1/Tier 2/Tier 3 challenge for BigLaw. Briefly, the Tiers are: 1: What everyone aspires to. Think…
     Fourth in Our Series on Strategy: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3?
Toby Brown and Ron Friedmann (both friends) have a thoughtful and well-reasoned point/counter-point going over at "3 Geeks and a Law Blog," which they invited…
     We're Not The Newspaper Industry
When Slate writes about it, it's entered the mainstream. In this case, that would be the "whopping" 11.5% year over year drop in the number…
     Seminar on Value-Billing Fee Arrangements/New York/March 24
I'd like to bring to your attention an all-day seminar happening here in midtown New York on Thursday, March 24th, sponsored by the Ark Group…
     The "Adam Smith" Award for Innovation in Legal Service Delivery
A couple of weeks ago I learned that the legal department of Kraft Foods issued its "Adam Smith" award, for innovation in the delivery…
     Reminder: Brief Survey on Law Firm Leadership
Don't forget to the take the Law Firm Leadership Survey co-sponsored by Adam Smith, Esq., and Vault.com, Inc., the leading online career intelligence site.The survey…
     Third in Our Series on Strategy: Bad Strategy
As a management consultant to law firms, perhaps the most consistently infuriating phenomenon I encounter (all the time and everywhere, I'm deeply sorry to…
     Joe Flom, 1923-2011
We've all heard the sad news that Joe Flom died Wednesday at age 87.  (WSJ, The American Lawyer, The New York Times, DealBook) Over 20…
     A Modest Proposal for Alternative Fees
There's been so much talk recently about "alternative fee arrangements" (AFAs) that, frankly, we're exhausted. But before we give up on the subject entirely…
     Survey on Law Firm Leadership: An Adam Smith, Esq./Vault.com, Inc. Collaboration
With delight I can announce that Adam Smith, Esq. is embarking on a collaborative effort with Vault.com, Inc, the leading career intelligence site for those…
     What's the Half-Life of a Lateral Partner in London?
A-ha! That, at least, was my reaction when reading the research report published this week in The Lawyer.  Here are the top-line results, and then…
     New Client Minimums? Meet DLA
Tim Bratton, the general counsel of the Financial Times, has an interesting perspective on DLA Piper's recently announced plan to revamp its client base.…
     Winners Take All? Yes, No: Debate Among Yourselves
I suppose that when it's in The Wall Street Journal, it's true. Well, it's certainly true that attention must be paid. Which brings us…
     Show Me the Money (And the Love)
Here on Adam Smith, Esq., we've never devoted a lot of ink to work/life balance issues or, for that matter, to lawyers' happiness with…
     Kaizen Comes to The City
A few days ago I had a chance to catch up with my friend Alex Hamilton, now at radiant.law.  (I knew Alex in his previous…
     Second in Our Series on Strategy: Strategic Planning 101
Booz & Co.'s Strategy + Business published something of a primer called "Successful Strategic Planning" last month, and it's worth a quick review for the distilled--if…
     First in a Series on Strategy in the New Normal
"With all respect, I think that's the wrong question. There's always new stuff out there, and most of it's not very good. Rather than…
     We Are Not Alone
This is a tale of how this is not your father's recession. About a year ago I read Reinhart and Rogoff's This Time is…