Saturday 18 June, 2011

Are You a Prince or a Baron?

Aren't you relieved that you don't have wolfpacks of Wall Street analysts and the multimedia, 24/7 business press breathing down your neck to deliver "the numbers" every quarter?  Isn't it great living in private-firm land and having the luxury of focusing on the long run?

The problem is:  Are you really?  I would argue that the pressures of your partner-colleagues, who have this irrational belief that every year should bring another new Mercedes and two weeks in the south of France, are at least as relentless in motivating short-term thinking as the most acid-penned analyst.  So when McKinsey does a piece counseling public companies on how to balance "performance" (read: this quarter) with "health" (sustainable, profitable growth), I say it's germane to us. Here's the trap:

"One major European financial-services company recently discovered how easy it is for performance and health to get out of balance. After the company had achieved an impressive turnaround in its short-term financial performance in the three years to 2004, it found to its dismay that this success had been accompanied by falling customer service levels, a huge increase in staff turnover, and a fall in its share price. Management complained that the financial markets didn't understand what the company had achieved. But in reality they understood, all too well, that its short-term success had been purchased at the expense of its underlying health."

This firm is not the exception.  Shockingly, more than 80% of executives surveyed said they would cut R&D and marketing costs to make the quarterly numbers—even if they believed it would hurt long-term health. 

I'm now going to assume you're convinced longer-term thinking is a healthy habit to have.  Let's try to dimensionalize what that means.

Strategy, as always, comes first.

The trouble with the future is that it's unpredictable, so deus ex machina strategies delivered from on high are unlikely to survive an encounter with reality.  The sane and effective alternative is to develop a portfolio of initiatives, spanning different practice areas, geographic regions, and most importantly different time-frames, that will give your firm options down the road.  Only you can identify what those might be, but some examples would be:  Putting a few litigators in an office opened for another reason to test the local waters; making a bet on a region's economic growth engine and preparing to serve it (wouldn't it have been nice to have a high-tech practice capability in northern Virginia ca. 1993?); or deciding that it's too expensive to cherry-pick laterals for practice group X and start a concerted effort to groom associates for that field.

Metrics are next.  To be of any use, they must be:

  • focused;
  • relevant; and
  • few.

By "few" I mean three to five, and you probably know subconsciously what some of them are:   Client satisfaction; retention of key people; depth of your management pool.  If "collection rate on past-due receivables" popped into your mind, go to the back of the class.

Communication. This means both internal and external.  Haven't yet done a client survey?  Do you think P&G would change the type font on the end-flap of a tube of Crest without multiple focus groups?   You care about your clients; it wouldn't hurt to tell them.  Ask them what they're worried about.  Even spend a "free day" with each of your best clients and let them set the agenda; if that doesn't generate many multiples of the "sacrificed" time, drinks are on me.  You should also care what the trade press and even professors at law schools you like to draw from think about your firm; don't leave them to figure it out for themselves.

Internal communication, in a business comprised of "elevator assets," is even more important.   And for the record, include associates; you were once one yourself and, with any luck, they are your firm's future.

Leadership is indispensable; nor is it a "soft" value.  Anyone bright and verbal enough to be a professional in your firm will be highly attuned to the overall message senior management is delivering.  And don't think that message doesn't come through loud and clear, thanks to what Niall FitzGerald, former Unilever Chairman and CEO, called the "extraordinary amplification system" boosting the gain on all pronouncements from the top.  Perhaps above all, in a law firm a leader's goal should be to nurture the future by cultivating talent:  This means making sure the right incentives are in place to promote collaboration, effort devoted to the greater interest of the firm and not one partner's individual clientele, sharing, and tying compensation to more than this year's results.  

In a memorable metaphor, McKinsey recommends thinking of the role of every manager as that of a "prince" rather than a "baron"—someone responsible for the commonweal as a whole rather than a limited jurisdiction.

Lastly, remember this from Econ 101:  Pay people for what you want them to do. 

Incentives will always out in the end.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.adamsmithesq.com/cgi-bin/mt5.01/mt-tb.cgi/2156

Leave a comment

Monthly Archives

 
Select a month from the dropdown
 

Recent Entries

     "Wait and [Never] See"
Last week I wrote about innovation and how the early adopters can gain sustainable competitive advantage.  This week is something of a follow-on, albeit one…
     Memorial Day 2011
     Be Innovative? Who, Me?
Jim Surowiecki, writing his regular column in The New Yorker, "The Financial Page," wrote last week about innovation and why it seems to take hold…
     God is in the Details
Alex Novarese, Editor in Chief of LegalWeek, has a smart column this week called "Rugged Individualism--a year of firm-specific achievement in the US." Here are…
     Limits, Still
Normally I don't refer to events stemming from my own experience in commenting on our industry-indeed, this is something of a first in the 8-year…
     Who's Signing Your Paycheck?
A loyal and exceptionally thoughtful reader, and reasonably regular correspondent (also with a strong academic background in economics), writes: Bruce: I enjoyed your 9 February think…
     Adam Smith, Esq. Launches A New Company: JD Match
Today Adam Smith, Esq. takes great pleasure in announcing the launch of a new company dedicated to rationalizing and bringing a measure of order, efficiency,…
     Fifth in Our Series on Strategy: What it Takes to Be Tier 2
Recently, I wrote about what I called the Tier 1/Tier 2/Tier 3 challenge for BigLaw. Briefly, the Tiers are: 1: What everyone aspires to. Think…
     Fourth in Our Series on Strategy: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3?
Toby Brown and Ron Friedmann (both friends) have a thoughtful and well-reasoned point/counter-point going over at "3 Geeks and a Law Blog," which they invited…
     We're Not The Newspaper Industry
When Slate writes about it, it's entered the mainstream. In this case, that would be the "whopping" 11.5% year over year drop in the number…
     Seminar on Value-Billing Fee Arrangements/New York/March 24
I'd like to bring to your attention an all-day seminar happening here in midtown New York on Thursday, March 24th, sponsored by the Ark Group…
     The "Adam Smith" Award for Innovation in Legal Service Delivery
A couple of weeks ago I learned that the legal department of Kraft Foods issued its "Adam Smith" award, for innovation in the delivery…
     Reminder: Brief Survey on Law Firm Leadership
Don't forget to the take the Law Firm Leadership Survey co-sponsored by Adam Smith, Esq., and Vault.com, Inc., the leading online career intelligence site.The survey…
     Third in Our Series on Strategy: Bad Strategy
As a management consultant to law firms, perhaps the most consistently infuriating phenomenon I encounter (all the time and everywhere, I'm deeply sorry to…
     Joe Flom, 1923-2011
We've all heard the sad news that Joe Flom died Wednesday at age 87.  (WSJ, The American Lawyer, The New York Times, DealBook) Over 20…
     A Modest Proposal for Alternative Fees
There's been so much talk recently about "alternative fee arrangements" (AFAs) that, frankly, we're exhausted. But before we give up on the subject entirely…
     Survey on Law Firm Leadership: An Adam Smith, Esq./Vault.com, Inc. Collaboration
With delight I can announce that Adam Smith, Esq. is embarking on a collaborative effort with Vault.com, Inc, the leading career intelligence site for those…
     What's the Half-Life of a Lateral Partner in London?
A-ha! That, at least, was my reaction when reading the research report published this week in The Lawyer.  Here are the top-line results, and then…
     New Client Minimums? Meet DLA
Tim Bratton, the general counsel of the Financial Times, has an interesting perspective on DLA Piper's recently announced plan to revamp its client base.…
     Winners Take All? Yes, No: Debate Among Yourselves
I suppose that when it's in The Wall Street Journal, it's true. Well, it's certainly true that attention must be paid. Which brings us…
     Show Me the Money (And the Love)
Here on Adam Smith, Esq., we've never devoted a lot of ink to work/life balance issues or, for that matter, to lawyers' happiness with…
     Kaizen Comes to The City
A few days ago I had a chance to catch up with my friend Alex Hamilton, now at radiant.law.  (I knew Alex in his previous…
     Second in Our Series on Strategy: Strategic Planning 101
Booz & Co.'s Strategy + Business published something of a primer called "Successful Strategic Planning" last month, and it's worth a quick review for the distilled--if…
     First in a Series on Strategy in the New Normal
"With all respect, I think that's the wrong question. There's always new stuff out there, and most of it's not very good. Rather than…
     We Are Not Alone
This is a tale of how this is not your father's recession. About a year ago I read Reinhart and Rogoff's This Time is…