Saturday 18 June, 2011

Human Capital Management

The Holy Grail of assembling the most potent and effective team for a client matter is, simply put, to have the right people in the right place at the right time.  Wal-Mart (and other companies like Toyota) have achieved this with inventory and supplies; what stands in the way of achieving a similar high-productivity, high-delivery-level miracle with people?  After all, in a knowledge organization such as a law firm, talent is your inventory. 

Of course, all talent is by no means equal, so to prepare the groundwork for "human capital management" means identifying and grouping your people by their subject-matter expertise and their level of experience.  In a law firm, much of this work is essentially done:  "senior corporate partner," e.g., says pretty much all you need to know.  But other distinctions are fuzzier, and worth taking the time to delineate.  For example, when is a "senior securities associate" more appropriate for a financing deal than a "junior asset-backed finance partner"?

Again, our friends at McKinsey have done a yeoman job of laying it out. Patterns may emerge that cause you to re-think how you've always done things.  McKinsey offers the example of a $100-million/year "corporate law firm" with undue attrition among senior associates, causing, in turn, an increase in writeoffs.  If it were to turn out that many of the departed, disgruntled associates had been working on a particular class of deals with a particular handfull of partners, that case-assignment pattern could be broken.

So can you run out and buy this software?  Not quite yet; McKinsey estimates another year to 18 months before it shows up in any form remotely resembling off the shelf.  But considering that it addresses the absolutely indispensable core of your competitive distinction—your talented lawyers—you should be thinking about it now.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.adamsmithesq.com/cgi-bin/mt5.01/mt-tb.cgi/2035

1 Comment

Here is a case where it is worth considering that you tend to find what you're looking for, not so much what's available. But what if the available stuff is more valuable than what you're looking for? KM in the legal domain necessarily must grapple with how to research "unstructured" data versus structured data(think narrative information as opposed to data bases). But that's not enough, because there must also be research by "formed" or formatted data - namely, certain classifications of docmentation, as opposed to certain classes of data. The real question in practical KM is this: if data can be discovered and acquired, will the firm take the steps to document the data, and will classified data get put into classified documents? This last question points to a many-to-many relationship for which control finds housekeeping (motivation) on one side, scribes and technology in the middle(opportunity), and business innovation (motivation) on the other side. To get a grip on what in this spectrum can be done with technology, visit the folks at Tacit Knowledge, a very content-wise California company.

Leave a comment

Monthly Archives

 
Select a month from the dropdown
 

Recent Entries

     "Wait and [Never] See"
Last week I wrote about innovation and how the early adopters can gain sustainable competitive advantage.  This week is something of a follow-on, albeit one…
     Memorial Day 2011
     Be Innovative? Who, Me?
Jim Surowiecki, writing his regular column in The New Yorker, "The Financial Page," wrote last week about innovation and why it seems to take hold…
     God is in the Details
Alex Novarese, Editor in Chief of LegalWeek, has a smart column this week called "Rugged Individualism--a year of firm-specific achievement in the US." Here are…
     Limits, Still
Normally I don't refer to events stemming from my own experience in commenting on our industry-indeed, this is something of a first in the 8-year…
     Who's Signing Your Paycheck?
A loyal and exceptionally thoughtful reader, and reasonably regular correspondent (also with a strong academic background in economics), writes: Bruce: I enjoyed your 9 February think…
     Adam Smith, Esq. Launches A New Company: JD Match
Today Adam Smith, Esq. takes great pleasure in announcing the launch of a new company dedicated to rationalizing and bringing a measure of order, efficiency,…
     Fifth in Our Series on Strategy: What it Takes to Be Tier 2
Recently, I wrote about what I called the Tier 1/Tier 2/Tier 3 challenge for BigLaw. Briefly, the Tiers are: 1: What everyone aspires to. Think…
     Fourth in Our Series on Strategy: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3?
Toby Brown and Ron Friedmann (both friends) have a thoughtful and well-reasoned point/counter-point going over at "3 Geeks and a Law Blog," which they invited…
     We're Not The Newspaper Industry
When Slate writes about it, it's entered the mainstream. In this case, that would be the "whopping" 11.5% year over year drop in the number…
     Seminar on Value-Billing Fee Arrangements/New York/March 24
I'd like to bring to your attention an all-day seminar happening here in midtown New York on Thursday, March 24th, sponsored by the Ark Group…
     The "Adam Smith" Award for Innovation in Legal Service Delivery
A couple of weeks ago I learned that the legal department of Kraft Foods issued its "Adam Smith" award, for innovation in the delivery…
     Reminder: Brief Survey on Law Firm Leadership
Don't forget to the take the Law Firm Leadership Survey co-sponsored by Adam Smith, Esq., and Vault.com, Inc., the leading online career intelligence site.The survey…
     Third in Our Series on Strategy: Bad Strategy
As a management consultant to law firms, perhaps the most consistently infuriating phenomenon I encounter (all the time and everywhere, I'm deeply sorry to…
     Joe Flom, 1923-2011
We've all heard the sad news that Joe Flom died Wednesday at age 87.  (WSJ, The American Lawyer, The New York Times, DealBook) Over 20…
     A Modest Proposal for Alternative Fees
There's been so much talk recently about "alternative fee arrangements" (AFAs) that, frankly, we're exhausted. But before we give up on the subject entirely…
     Survey on Law Firm Leadership: An Adam Smith, Esq./Vault.com, Inc. Collaboration
With delight I can announce that Adam Smith, Esq. is embarking on a collaborative effort with Vault.com, Inc, the leading career intelligence site for those…
     What's the Half-Life of a Lateral Partner in London?
A-ha! That, at least, was my reaction when reading the research report published this week in The Lawyer.  Here are the top-line results, and then…
     New Client Minimums? Meet DLA
Tim Bratton, the general counsel of the Financial Times, has an interesting perspective on DLA Piper's recently announced plan to revamp its client base.…
     Winners Take All? Yes, No: Debate Among Yourselves
I suppose that when it's in The Wall Street Journal, it's true. Well, it's certainly true that attention must be paid. Which brings us…
     Show Me the Money (And the Love)
Here on Adam Smith, Esq., we've never devoted a lot of ink to work/life balance issues or, for that matter, to lawyers' happiness with…
     Kaizen Comes to The City
A few days ago I had a chance to catch up with my friend Alex Hamilton, now at radiant.law.  (I knew Alex in his previous…
     Second in Our Series on Strategy: Strategic Planning 101
Booz & Co.'s Strategy + Business published something of a primer called "Successful Strategic Planning" last month, and it's worth a quick review for the distilled--if…
     First in a Series on Strategy in the New Normal
"With all respect, I think that's the wrong question. There's always new stuff out there, and most of it's not very good. Rather than…
     We Are Not Alone
This is a tale of how this is not your father's recession. About a year ago I read Reinhart and Rogoff's This Time is…